reviews_and_ramblings (
reviews_and_ramblings) wrote2010-02-06 07:18 pm
This is probably the reason why I don't have a Facebook account...
... and why I'm thinking to delete my quite unused MySpace one.
read on Michael Breyette's blog: http://michaelbreyette.blogspot.com/2010/02/when-does-objection-to-nudity-become.html
Do you remember my post about the next exhibition of Paul Richmond and his Cheesecake Boys? Michael will be one of the gaylebrities that will model as Cheesecake Boys and he posted a funny picture on his Facebook fan page:

and yes, I'm reposting it not under the cut. I don't have anything against nudity, and people that frequent my Man Candy posts well know that, but if there is a full frontal nudity I put it under a cut. In this case, I will not, but not since I want to be daring, but since I don't find the above picture "scandalous". There is only an hint of cheeks, no butt crack, I even find it more thoughtful than sexy.
As I said in my comment on Michael's post, I don't like the majority of people on those media, so I'm not surprised that a woman, who was in the list of Michael's friends (!) asked for the picture to be removed... but that Facebook actually did it? They don't have a thinking mind? There is porn and there is art, and all right, sometime there is a subtle line between them, but not in the case above.
So I will state it here, profiting of Michael's disaventure: I will post pictures of naked men (or women if I like), but if it's a full frontal nude, I will put it under a cut. If not, I will post it as above. Friends, you will have to trust me and my judgement.
read on Michael Breyette's blog: http://michaelbreyette.blogspot.com/2010/02/when-does-objection-to-nudity-become.html
Do you remember my post about the next exhibition of Paul Richmond and his Cheesecake Boys? Michael will be one of the gaylebrities that will model as Cheesecake Boys and he posted a funny picture on his Facebook fan page:

and yes, I'm reposting it not under the cut. I don't have anything against nudity, and people that frequent my Man Candy posts well know that, but if there is a full frontal nudity I put it under a cut. In this case, I will not, but not since I want to be daring, but since I don't find the above picture "scandalous". There is only an hint of cheeks, no butt crack, I even find it more thoughtful than sexy.
As I said in my comment on Michael's post, I don't like the majority of people on those media, so I'm not surprised that a woman, who was in the list of Michael's friends (!) asked for the picture to be removed... but that Facebook actually did it? They don't have a thinking mind? There is porn and there is art, and all right, sometime there is a subtle line between them, but not in the case above.
So I will state it here, profiting of Michael's disaventure: I will post pictures of naked men (or women if I like), but if it's a full frontal nude, I will put it under a cut. If not, I will post it as above. Friends, you will have to trust me and my judgement.

no subject
no subject
Actually I'm more worried on the heavyness of the page, to create problem to people when they upload the page, and so probably, I post most of the pictures under a cut for that reason.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I understand that everyone has their personal opinion and different levels of comfort regarding nudity. I actually find some images and videos on the TV nowadays much more aggressive and potentially offensive than most of the art you feature, and much more subversive.
But again, that's just IMHO! :)
no subject
What I find really unsettling is that Michael's fanpage is rated, not allowed for under 18, and it's right, Michael's art is a bit extreme. So, if you are on his friends page, you know him... why do you have to complain for a picture as the one above?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
E se nessuno segnala, beh, restano gruppi come "A morte questo o quello" o simili.
Trovo questa foto di M. Breyette molto bella e sensuale, senza mostrare quasi nulla. E sottolineo il quasi nulla, perchè quella curva di sedere che si vede è meno di quello che vedo quotidianamente e a qualunque ora in televisione...
no subject
Naked man and women
(Anonymous) 2010-02-06 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)Mick
www.mykoladementiuk.com
Re: Naked man and women
no subject
If the self-righteous zipper-sniffers who are "protecting" children from knowing that gays and lesbians existed would turn their attention to being better parents, they'd have less to worry about.
no subject
> but goddamn it, I'd LOVE to have that pic you posted on one of my covers.
LOL Michael is a cover artist, but maybe, if you ask nicely, he can be a model too ;-) I'm jocking, I don't think he wants a second career!
no subject
no subject
no subject
Alex did a great article on the subject over here:
http://bookworld.editme.com/CoverArtTorsos
I really wish some attractive, enterprising young men would go into business for themselves. There's a model who sells pics of himself (alone and with models) specifically aimed at romance cover designers--but he won't do m/m poses.
For a model or actor who wants to get his face (and other attributes) out in print and build a reputation, small-press could be a real boon in the way of free publicity. He/they wouldn't make much off each picture, but it'd be pizza money, at least.
no subject
no subject
i think the Facebook people have no right to remove that picture (that woman who commented, does she even know who she friended?)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Um, does that make me a bigot...?
no subject
Thanks
(Anonymous) 2010-02-08 04:34 pm (UTC)(link)Thanks for posting about this. I am quite amazed by all the positive reaction I've read on here, on my facebook fanpage and another blog that posted about the complaint and censorship.
With all that goes on in the world, It's hard for me to comprehend that people choose to be offended by the human body, or even by sex for that matter. But offended they are, even over the slightest hint of skin, how do they get through their day?
~Michael Breyette
Re: Thanks